MB

 

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
BACK TO THE MANCHESTER BIRDING WEBSITE HOMEPAGE -> Manchester Birding Forum -> GENERAL BIRDING DISCUSSION -> Say NO to the World Logistics Hub
Post Info TOPIC: Say NO to the World Logistics Hub
Henry Cook


Status: Offline
Posts: 1703
Date:
RE: Say NO to the World Logistics Hub
Permalink  

Unfortunately the Manchester public access map is terrible (on purpose?) so it makes it hard to find out for sure what the boundaries are for this application.

Sounds like Woodhouse Park (Painswick Park) may go which I find pretty incredible as this space is for the amenity of the public not big business. I've noticed the park has pretty much been abandoned by the council during this period of cuts, which ironically enough has improved its environmental value as rough grassland now ajoins bramble scrub. Lesser Whitethroat still breed in this area but are unlikely to if all the habitat is ripped out and replaced with concrete.

Henry.

__________________
Ian Woosey


Status: Offline
Posts: 1171
Date:
Permalink  

I have since found out that the area being proposed for developement falls under Cheshire Wildlife Trusts` remit. Contact for their Planning Department is-

cdriver@cheshirewt.org.uk or 01948 820728

__________________
Ian Woosey


Status: Offline
Posts: 1171
Date:
Permalink  

I do not have a map readily to hand, so do not know the precise boundries, but I wonder if Lancashire or Cheshire Wildlife Trusts are aware of this latest Planning application ? It might be worth enquiring through official channels. I do know however, that "Manchester Airport" is a "Silver" Corporate Member of Lancs WT !?

-- Edited by Ian Woosey on Wednesday 19th of December 2012 10:58:53 AM

__________________
Ian McKerchar


Status: Offline
Posts: 15669
Date:
Permalink  

Following on from the recently-approved World Logistics Hub, there is now a second major development, the 65-acre Airport City North, currently going through public consultation.

Here is the link to the full application (100831):

http://www.publicaccess.manchester.gov.uk/associateddocs/MCCList1.aspx?100831/OO/2012/S2

We really need to amass as much opposition to this as is possible while we still can, so please send your objections to Dave Lawless. Dave has said he will accept comments right up until Thursday morning (22nd). Objections can be sent to him on d.lawless@manchester.gov.uk The final decision will be made at the Manchester City Council Planning and Highways Meeting on 17th January, and it is possible to submit comments right up until then, although by then approval will presumably have been recommended by the Wythenshawe Area Committee.

__________________

Forum administrator and owner
Craig Higson


Status: Offline
Posts: 1274
Date:
Permalink  

Henry Cook wrote:

Where does it stop?


-- Edited by Henry Cook on Sunday 25th of November 2012 07:05:44 PM




Unfortunately Henry, it will probably only stop when someone realises that they have just felled the last tree, filled in the last lake and built over the last grasslands. There's a quote somewhere about only stopping destroying the environment for economics when people realise you can't eat bank notes. It's very true.

__________________
No one on their death bed ever said they wished they'd spent more time at work. http://bitsnbirds.blogspot.co.uk
Henry Cook


Status: Offline
Posts: 1703
Date:
Permalink  

A shame to see another loss for the environment over short-termism and economic greed. Where does it stop?
Thanks to everyone who got involved in the campaign.

-- Edited by Henry Cook on Sunday 25th of November 2012 07:05:44 PM

__________________
Tim Wilcox


Status: Offline
Posts: 1031
Date:
Permalink  

Very sadly the battle was lost last Thursday and planning permission was approved

-- Edited by Tim Wilcox on Sunday 25th of November 2012 05:40:40 PM

__________________
Chris Harper


Status: Offline
Posts: 1961
Date:
Permalink  

I was there too. The speakers seemed totally against it, and then one of the labour MP's said 'Greenbelt building will have to happen, unfortunately'. Usual lack of clarity.
It is the same one that was totally against global warming and increasing CO2 emissions, but said the Shale Gas in Lancashire was basically irrelevant.

__________________
JamieDunning


Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink  

I was lucky enough to attend Environment Question time, run by the RSPB & Labour party last week, where this was briefly mentioned and sparked a fair debate about the quality of greenbelt land and wether there is ever an exception to the protection to make room building projects. it linked quite nicely then into 'Green Growth'. all very interesting, have taken rough notes if anybody in interested, though they are regarding a national level as opposed to being specific to this one!

I should add I am opposed to this!

J

__________________
-J
richard howells 2


Status: Offline
Posts: 67
Date:
Permalink  

Signed, even as a former airport worker, I wouldn't like to see it sprawl any further.

__________________
Rafik Filobbos


Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink  

Many thanks for your time and help Tim - it is much appreciated. Every signature on the petition and letter of objection sent will help and hopefully save this beautiful area.

__________________
Tim Wilcox


Status: Offline
Posts: 1031
Date:
Permalink  

Petition signed and letter of protest sent to the Senior Planner at MCC with copy to the Save Sunbank campaign

__________________
Joe Wynn


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:
Permalink  

Signed.

__________________
A few of my photos : Joewynn's Flickr I've got a Blog!
Rory Newton


Status: Offline
Posts: 111
Date:
Permalink  

Sighned


__________________
Flickr
Rafik Filobbos


Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink  

Once again many thanks to those who have signed the petition. Having read several of your passionate views on the e-petition I am back asking for more help, particularly from those of you know the local area.

Manchester Council have published the Planning Documents submitted by the airport and opponents have until 21st September to reply.

As I previously stated in the discussion forum we would be very keen for anybody interested and opposed to the plans to concrete Sunbank Lane to review Manchester Airport's claims about the effect of the proposed development on the native bird population - the airport's overall assessment is that the development will have a "minor adverse effect" on the local breeding bird habitat - I personally think this is an underestimation of the impact but I think those of you whom freqently walk this area are best placed to pass comment on the claims of the airport about the impact on the local bird population.

The council website is:- http://www.publicaccess.manchester.gov.uk/associateddocs/MCCList1.aspx?100263/OO/2012/S2
Having read further into the documents supplied by the airport the main report is in fact:-
100263-EIA-0002.pdf section 4.103 - the proposed effects of a "moderate adverse impact with minor adverse effect " on the breeding bird habitat are described under section 4.147.
Further info is contained in 100263-EIA-0009.pdf related to the studies performed.

Any further help you can provide us with would be much appreciated - I would ask you to submit your objections to Mr David Lawless : Senior Planner, PO Box 532, Town Hall, Manchester M60 2LA ref 100263/OO/2012/S2- we are currently centralizing our own responses to the following email address:- savesunbank@gmail.com.


Many thanks in advance for any of you who may help - the more letters of objections submitted the better.




__________________
Pete Astles


Status: Offline
Posts: 277
Date:
Permalink  

Signed.

If you see signature below newton park forum which is another similar campaign albeit we don't have a planning application yet.

__________________
http://ourlocalvoice.co.uk/
Steve Suttill


Status: Offline
Posts: 1605
Date:
Permalink  

Signed.

Sadly, the government's proposals to cut through "red tape" (I would prefer to call it democracy) with regard to planning procedures will mean that soon we won't be able to stop this environmental destruction.

__________________
Steve "Make your birdwatching count!"
John Doherty


Status: Offline
Posts: 619
Date:
Permalink  

Signed and link Tweeted.

-- Edited by John Doherty on Thursday 6th of September 2012 10:19:21 AM

__________________
Keep calm and carry on birding....
Rafik Filobbos


Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink  

Many thanks to those who have signed the petition.

At long last Manchester Council have published the Planning Documents submitted by the airport and opponents have until 21st September to reply. Suffice to say there is a mountain of paperwork to get through.

I would be very keen for anybody interested and opposed to the plans to concrete Sunbank Lane to review Manchester Airport's claims about the effect of the proposed development on the native bird population - I think many of you walk this area often will be best placed to pass comment.

The council website is:- http://www.publicaccess.manchester.gov.uk/associateddocs/MCCList1.aspx?100263/OO/2012/S2
As far as I have read thus far 100263-EIA-0009.pdf is the main document commenting on the local bird population.

I would ask you to submit your objections to Mr David Lawless : Senior Planner, PO Box 532, Town Hall, Manchester M60 2LA or to savesunbank@gmail.com

Many thanks in advance for any of you who may help - the more letters of objections submitted the better.









__________________
Henry Cook


Status: Offline
Posts: 1703
Date:
Permalink  

Signed.

It will be terrible to lose a local patch and the only rural site left in the whole of Manchester borough.

This development would be on the back of a decline in the cargo demand for Manchester airport so there isn't even an economic imperative for this.

Henry.

__________________
Ian McKerchar


Status: Offline
Posts: 15669
Date:
Permalink  

Unfortunately it seems that Manchester Council have only allowed around 2 weeks for any oppositions to be made so please sign the petition sooner rather than later

__________________

Forum administrator and owner
Tony Coatsworth


Status: Offline
Posts: 937
Date:
Permalink  

+ 1

__________________

Chris Harper


Status: Offline
Posts: 1961
Date:
Permalink  

Totally. Have signed. Ridiculous destruction of habitat yet again. Once built, will then increase traffic, so encourage more road building etc etc.

__________________
Rafik Filobbos


Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink  

Forgive the imposition on the website but I would like to gain as much support as possible to oppose the Airport (council and government's) plans to concrete Sunbank Lane.

Manchester Airport is cynically taking advantage of our current economic decline and the enterprise zone tag in destroying more of our greenbelt land to build freight warehouses on farmland and evicting local residents.

This will merely displace current jobs in order to take advantage of reduced rates due to the enterprise tag and will NOT create "new" jobs. This will have no effect on local unemployment or the local economy and will merely make a few wealthy people even richer, whilst creating more pollution and killing off the local wildlife. This will undoubtedly lead to the decline of the bird population in the surrounding neighbourhood.

Please sign this e- petition to save our countryside:-
http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/save-sunbank-lane-from-manchester-airport-s-expansion-plans


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
BACK TO THE MANCHESTER BIRDING WEBSITE HOMEPAGE -> Manchester Birding Forum -> GENERAL BIRDING DISCUSSION -> Say NO to the World Logistics Hub

RODIS

 

This forum is dedicated to the memory of Eva Janice McKerchar.