To bring an old thread back to life, just read a post that includes sighting of a "Lappis", what is this? sounds like something a p-erson with a weak bladder might do by accident Cheers Ian
okay,now everyones got a copy of Birds Britannica you will see it informs you of the folklore of the bird and its history, excellent book, but getting back to the name.
SHAG First recorded in 1556 "schagge" next in 1602 shags the term refers to the crest in breeding plumage it is thus a name based on a part of the bird.
In popular use this bird and the cormorant may go under one name Scarf used in the Orkney and Shetland since 1701 which stems from and older Norse word skarfr.
however due to Judith,s injuries it maybe re-name the little sh*t bird.
This is what i can find on name of shag means skegg in norwegian,which means beard,,the beard is the crest on its head,use to be called green cormorant,,and tufted skart hope that helps Jimmy
That Birds Britannica book is a belter - been having a good nosey through... Lapwing being known as "Chewit" in Lancs... my Dad mentioned that previously.
Also - "Sheppies" - now, I've known these were Starlings for may a year - I didn't know they also had the unfortunate nickname of 'Sh*tlegs'.
Some mad stuff in there - all very interesting though!
I knew we would get down this and there is great scope to go off on a mega tangent with this one, however
I believe a shag was a shag long before the Slang term for sexual intercourse was used, but as with all names many a myth surrounds its origin.
Perhaps the fact that it has a shaggy crest in breeding plumage may be a reason.
According to Birds Britannica The Shetland youth information service has renamed it Scarfie
Whichever way you look at it the morning conversation with Warfy Riggers Skiddo, Dave and Mel did take a slightly smutty tone, and well done on getting your Scarfie warfy, ( sorry could not help it. )
I have plenty of books that I had forgotten about. To avoid incuring the wrath of Mrs Riggers, when I buy a new book, I stash it out of the way behind other books. Then, when tidying up I come across said book and say "Oh, I forgot I that one-I think I will have a read".
Its only the same as all those dresses and shoes that fall out of Mrs.Riggers wardrobe which she says she has had for years!
What is good for the Goose, is good for the Gander as they say!
Where's that book? lets look up Gander!
I clearly remeber a number of books being sneeked into your house after a birding trip, especially trips to Norfolk when we would decend on Titchwell and spend a bit of time in the shop!
I have plenty of books that I had forgotten about. To avoid incuring the wrath of Mrs Riggers, when I buy a new book, I stash it out of the way behind other books. Then, when tidying up I come across said book and say "Oh, I forgot I that one-I think I will have a read".
Its only the same as all those dresses and shoes that fall out of Mrs.Riggers wardrobe which she says she has had for years!
What is good for the Goose, is good for the Gander as they say!
Spent this afternoon indoors fixing a new bookcase to the wall of my study.(actually the box room-but study sounds good).After attaching said bookcase to the wall, I was filling it with books when I came across an old book I bought some years ago called "British Names of Birds" by Christine E Jackson.
I have spent the last 5 hrs flicking through it picking up gems such as a Robin is a falconers name for a male Hobby, a stagg is a one year old swan and that there is no such thing a "a brace of Pheasant"(brace is 2 game birds except Pheasant!).
There is a sedge of Bittern's, a fling of Dunlin, a plump of wildfowl, a knob of Pochard, a bouquet of Pheasants(not brace-dont forget) and a tok of Capercaillie's
Hence, the time is 1135hrs and I am still tidying up!!!!!
Mike, just spent 5 mins laughing at your post( I'm a City fan, don't get much to smile about ). Cheers Ian ps If a Balrog was about I bet Warfy would shorten it and Ian(GOD)Mck would see at least 10 on Astley Moss before anyone else Cheers again Ian
Almost my first 'proper' birdbook was a 1961 reprint of the 1941 'New Edition' of T.A. Cowards' "Birds of the Wayside and Woodland" a sort of Observers' Book of Birds for adults. That lists 'Sprosser or EASTERN Nightingale' so this must be a more commonly used name that has fallen out of use.
As for the rest: Oyk (noun of unknown origin: an uncouth or obnoxious person-Complete OED online) is 'acceptable'
Iky ( "sounds like an illness"- if you have maintained the vocabulary of a 5 year old!) is 'unacceptable'
Barwit (Rumpole of the Bailley?) is 'acceptable'
Blackwit (Richard Pryor?) is 'borderline' -rather like some of Melanie's diary entries!
Can't see much difference between the last two. If you use either are the young 'Halfwits'?
Except in official useage can there be any hard and fast rule for something that is obviously a matter of personal taste, usage and opinion?
Just seen this extract from http://leicesterllama.blogspot.com/ about Sprosser.
Calling a Thrush Nightingale a 'Sprosser' is one that I just don't get.
Everyone knows that it's simply the German name for the species, but when and more importantly why did it enter some British birders' vocabularies? We don't go around saying we've had good views of a Nachtigall, or twitched an Erddrossel or a Gartenbaumläufer for f***'s sake, so why pick on this one? Yes, it's a bit quicker than saying 'Thrush Nightingale', but then 'Streifenschwirl' is shorter than 'Pallas's Grasshopper Warbler' and we don't use that, do we? Although perhaps that's because it looks a bit difficult to pronounce, whereas even the dullest, most linguistically challenged twitcher can cope with Sprosser.
Birds do infact have proper names-what the hell is a Meadow Pipet,Rock Pipet,Water Pipet,Buff-Bellied Pipet,Blyth's Pipet,Richards Pipet,Pechora Pipet,Tree Pipet,Vinaceous-Breasted PipetNilgiri PipetMenzbier's Pipet etc
PIPIT(pip-it) a small bird, resembling a lark (from Collins Dictionary)
Pipet isn't even in the dictionary so I can quote anything funny
OYKS OK Warfy Just read the post about Rumworth Lodge? It sounds like LORD of the RINGS is going on down there! What with Oyks (what do they look like?). There will be Balrogs seen next. BIRDS HAVE PROPER NAMES Cheers Ian ps We now need suggestions for GM birders about who plays GOLLUM etc Only JokingCheers Ian
Hi All, Fantastic thread this one, just read it today on my lunch. Having got the 'birds names and folklore' book referred to earlier down the thread several years back I went a stage further about 18 months ago and went on a search for a little known but highly prized specialist book: A Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names by James A. Jobling (Oxford Uni Press, 1991). I could not find a copy of this through any book stores online, bird book specailists (including ones at bird fairs) and only occassionally have I found it on Amazon, but it is always for between £150 and £200, so always a non-starter there and once bid up to £60 on ebay for it, but was beaten at the last second Anyway, I finally traced down a copy in the John Rylands University Library, Oxford Road, as I have lifetime membership to this library and all its books and journals (absolutely brilliant resource for all manner of new and old publications). Only issue is that the book is referrence only so can't take it home, but photocopied some pages for bedtime reading!? Well, to get to my point, this book is the real brains behind the scientific names of all species and makes sense of so many strange titles that you always wondered what they meant, if you like Latin that is. The synopsis of the book is as follows: This dictionary gives the derivation and meaning of all valid scientific bird names. Each part of the name is defined separately so that Passer domesticus, for example, will not be found as such, but both Passer and domesticus are explained in their respective alphabetical places. The usefulness of the dictionary will thus not be affected by future taxonomic revisions of generic or species names. About 8500 names are defined, including a selection of historical synonyms. Many unusual details emerge from the author's meticulous work in tracking down obscure meanings. A short but informative introduction explains the history and purposes of scientific nomenclature and the basic features of Latin in this context. It also discusses the ways in which birds have been named for their appearance, for a person or place, or some aspect of their habitat, behaviour, food, or voice, or with reference to their native-language name. This book should prove a valuable reference source for everyone whose work or interests bring them into contact with birds. Well, when it's raining like this you need something to read heh!?
The mighty have spoken and I must admit I am not one for straying into other forums or websites but Rob Frays blog is superb an excellent summing up and I bow down to the perfect answer to Bird names.
Book wise.
Birds Brittannica Mark Cocker Oxford book of bird names W B Lockwood All the birds of the Air Francesca Greenoak.
once again an excellent laugh over the past fews days with this thread,
When this thread started i had no idea what a "PG Tips" was. A bit of research found the answer. Then, my son bought me "Gripping Yarns" by Bill Oddie for fathers day. One of the stories is about the legendary "white tips". which aren't that obvious, aparently.
This months Birdwatching magazine also has a reference to "PG Tips".
However, exclaiming "Icky at 1 o'clock", will result in a more rapid resonse by the observers and may result in more people "getting on " it
However, I'd be far too busy cringing or rolling about laughing if I heard those words. My sentiments on the abbrevation of birds names are admirably echoed in Rob Fray's birding blog, http://www.robfray.co.uk/ and a bloody good summing up it is
Icky ? Melody ?? Sprosser ????????........what`s all that about ?
Ian,
There is a time and a place. Birds should be called by their proper names-with capital letters.
But when out in the field and you are lucky enough to find an Icterine Warbler for example, by the time you have got everybody's attention, by way of "Excuse me everybody but I have managed to find and correctly identify an Icterine Warbler in yonder bush"- it will have buggered off, never to be seen again!!!
However, exclaiming "Icky at 1 o'clock", will result in a more rapid resonse by the observers and may result in more people "getting on " it
Then again, if you say "Excuse me everybody but I have managed to find and correctly identify an Icterine Warbler in yonder bush"- it may give the Willow Warbler that you have mis identified ,enough time to disapear into dense undergrowth and cover up your mistake
Steve Suttill wrote: I think I should have lived in the days when they thought Barnacle Geese did hatch from barnacles and Swallows hibernated under water in reedbeds!
Where do they come from thenYou learn something new every day
I stand corrected Ian C! However I would contend that it's only a result of scientists not knowing their Latin - "Family" & "Genus" when they both mean the same, I ask you!!!
My Latin may well be better than average but I'm rubbish at science!
All this this stuff is being turned on its head by DNA analysis anyway, though I find it very hard to understand the latest articles on taxonomy in British Birds and the like. It's no fun when ornithology moves from the field and into the lab - I think I should have lived in the days when they thought Barnacle Geese did hatch from barnacles and Swallows hibernated under water in reedbeds!
Oh how I love it when a tangent happens on a thread, where are we going this this one, Latin Greek Grammer etc.
I am sure if Mr Mckerchar had a dentention section on here I would be in it doing lines,
I must learn my latin I must learn my latin,
Sadly been born in Gorton and raised in Wythenshawe Anglo-saxon was our second language, God forbid you ever admitted to been a birdwatcher, you would be hung drawn and laughed at, how i remember school days with fun.
In fact if we had a GM nativity play I am sure Steve Suttill, craig higson and Ian Campbell would be perfect for the three wise men.
You may be interested to know that the football board game Subbuteo was named after the scientific name for the Hobby (Falco subbuteo) when the inventor failed to get permission to register the game's name as a trademark.
If you think that's bad, you wouldn't have liked one of the sets of questions from the King William School Christmas Quiz a few years ago. There were ten phrases in English such as ' grass widow from Ithaca' which you had to convert into Latin, Greek or a Classical illusion, which gave you all or part of the scientific name of a British bird. The question was headed simply 'retranslate' and the answers were the birds' English names. This was for secondary school pupils, but, when I took the copy with me on our Norfolk trip it had several groups of adult birders scratchung their heads. I liked yellow-footed chicken best
Well done Craig, you just beat me to an almost identical post, sorry Stephanos but Family comes before Genus . Cheers Ian ps who cares anyway?, perhaps Trogledytester, the Wren does
The Hierarchical order with biological names etc is: Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species or 'King Philip Came Over For Great Sex' as my lecturer taught us.
So a Wren would be in the Animal Kingdom, Phylum Chordata (if memory serves correctly) Class Aves - and then you get down to specifics -Order Passerineformes, Family I think is Troglodytidae, Genus Troglodyte Species Troglodytes.
Hows that for remebering your lectures.
Sad or what
-- Edited by Craig Higson at 17:56, 2008-06-18
__________________
No one on their death bed ever said they wished they'd spent more time at work. http://bitsnbirds.blogspot.co.uk