I understand your point of view Steve, completely valid too, but we see thing from a different perspective to most folk. The BBC and RSPB ran a competion last year when the same thing was done. I can only assume it got families talking and children interested in birds, which can only be a good thing. I spoke to Amey the young girl who won the competition last year. It was an absolute joy to see her and to present her with prizes. She may grow up one day to be a serious birder/conservationist. It may have made a young girl isolated in her hobby feel more accepted. She would have gone back to school and I dare say been congratulated by her head teacher in front of the school and no doubt written her summer story to read to her class mates who no doubt would have talked to her about it. Her school may concentrate on wildlife issues just that bit more as I know some have. A couple of years ago I would have agreed with you. I am sure most will now, but I am prepared to accept the trade off without reservation, simply because I have seen the other side.
Besides the prog was not dumbed down they showed one of my peregrine pictures
Amongst my favourite nature films;-
Wild Britain....no naming of animals or birds....superb stuff!
Private Life of a Kingfisher ... no naming of birds, dated but good stuff. Peter Scott.
African wild dogs . The film featured a dog called Nukie or Nooky (what a name!)...absolutely cracking stuff and I wouldn't have wanted it done in a clinical style or scientific styleIn my view the film would not have achieved the emotional or the educational impact it had without the featured dog being named though others may disagree IMHO.
Just my pennies worth.
AD
-- Edited by Adrian Dancy at 01:49, 2008-07-25
Steve Suttill said
Thu Jul 24 9:42 AM, 2008
why, oh! why, oh! why... do we have to give birds names?
The BBC gets worse every day. "Dumbing down" is the politest way of putting it!
Sack the management and put David Attenborough in charge.
Dean Macdonald said
Tue Jul 22 10:34 PM, 2008
It was a good feature. But they invited viewers to name the chicks
How about Perry, Grin, Fal and Con.
Oh no i don't believe i just did that
Dean.
Simon Warford said
Tue Jul 22 9:10 PM, 2008
There was a good 10 mins on the Manchester peregrines, it was good, and 30 secs on the cattle egrets but i did miss the last 10 mins of the tour cause of a phonecall
Gary Marland said
Tue Jul 22 9:00 PM, 2008
Looks like I'll have to watch it on iPlayer then. I watched the Tour highlights before reading the forum. But thanks Judith for letting us know.
Gary
Simon Warford said
Tue Jul 22 5:37 PM, 2008
Off topic abit Judith but i believe nesting Cattle Egrets in the UK will also be featured, shame it clashes with the Tour de France highlights
Judith Smith said
Tue Jul 22 2:14 PM, 2008
I've received an enail from the RSPB to say that the BBC's The One Show at 7pm tonight will feature the Manchester Peregrines.
Besides the prog was not dumbed down they showed one of my peregrine pictures
Amongst my favourite nature films;-
Wild Britain....no naming of animals or birds....superb stuff!
Private Life of a Kingfisher ... no naming of birds, dated but good stuff. Peter Scott.
African wild dogs . The film featured a dog called Nukie or Nooky (what a name!)...absolutely cracking stuff and I wouldn't have wanted it done in a clinical style or scientific styleIn my view the film would not have achieved the emotional or the educational impact it had without the featured dog being named though others may disagree IMHO.
Just my pennies worth.
AD
-- Edited by Adrian Dancy at 01:49, 2008-07-25
The BBC gets worse every day. "Dumbing down" is the politest way of putting it!
Sack the management and put David Attenborough in charge.
It was a good feature. But they invited viewers to name the chicks
How about Perry, Grin, Fal and Con.
Oh no i don't believe i just did that
Dean.
Gary